On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 01:27:59AM -0400, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > For CVS gimp, it is definitely not a problem to require the current > bleeding edge GTK. Malcolm did you ask me first? If you didn't, how did you come to the conclusion that it wouldn't be a problem for me (a developer, even if not one who's able to dedicate many hours to Gimp right now) to install and tend a GTK+ HEAD tree just to keep my Gimp builds green? How will this make things better for me? NB I am not blind and I don't write code in Hebrew Nick. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Lourens Veen
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Kelly Martin
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port pcg
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Kelly Martin
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Michael Natterer
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Malcolm Tredinnick
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Nick Lamb
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Malcolm Tredinnick
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Seth Burgess
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Malcolm Tredinnick
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Michael Natterer
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Kelly Martin
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Lourens Veen
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Adam D. Moss
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Michael Natterer
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Sven Neumann
