On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:59:22PM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> decision. We came to the point that it should be called 2.0. It's just
> a number, so please, before you start the discussion again, think
> twice if it's worth it.

It's not just a number, it is also used in the sources of external
plug-ins. (e.g. AM_GIMP_2_0)... this is increased maintainance hassle,
again for little gain.

Thanks, however, for making it clear that you decided it, instead of just
letting the discussion die.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       [EMAIL PROTECTED]      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Reply via email to