would it be too troublesome to call this release that will just finish things
that have started, as 2.0.X series, instead of a 2.2 ?
On Thursday 25 March 2004 14:20, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > - Do a 2.2 release in about three months.
> > I think that's unrealistically short at this stage. There are people
> > who have said that they want to do some concrete and long-standing
> > TODO items, and 6 weeks to 2 months is not enough time to get most
> > of those done and debugged properly.
> IMHO we should rather try to finish what has started already and get
> these new features to our users quickly. 2 months should be sufficient
> to get that done. Whatever cannot be achieved in this time will have
> to wait for the next release then (which could be by the end of the
Gimp-developer mailing list