Interesting. I've never been involved in open source development processes before. What distinguishes a development version from a stable one? Is the idea to have the development version more "open" with respect to what goes in and then control which features are promoted from the development version to the "stable" version?
Andy On 10/10/07, Christoph Bergemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 October 2007 13:30:16 Andrew Young wrote: > > Please excuse the noob question. Why are there no odd numbered releases? > > e.g. 2.5? Do they have a special, internal role? > > According to old tradition, odd version numbers like 2.5 are for > development > versions. There was Gimp 2.3 but it was never marked stable instead the > stable release is now named 2.4. The same versioning system is used in the > Linux kernel. Gimp 2.5 will be the development tree for version 2.6. > > Christoph > _______________________________________________ > Gimp-developer mailing list > Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer > >
_______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
