> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:50:54 -0700 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] About bad new save export function in Gimp-2.8 > > The obvious design that satisfies both groups has been offered several times > and has been derided as --- I don't know why, although numerous attempts to > justify the current design has been proffered.
You mean the "make it a user preference" one? To me, the simplest compromise is to simply tweak the existing dialog message from an "I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that" message to an OK/Cancel prompt, to which the only dev response was to label it "fudging". Yes, it sort of is, but that's what compromise is about, right? But perhaps a better thing to remember is that when the devs refer to "safe" and "unsafe" workflows, I think these are meant to be terms with precise technical meanings and NOT a value judgement on whether the person is using GIMP "correctly". -- Stratadrake [email protected] -------------------- Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
_______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
