On Sunday 14 September 2003 01:07, Carol Spears wrote:
> what is the difference between these two things?
i'm not sure either, though i have thought that gap might be 'easier' to
run without gimp on machines that have limited resources, maybe i'm
wrong, i have no idea of the technologies involved.
whati have been doing with gap is to use xaos output and add effects.
gap does not support png though and what i do is to open the first image
of the sequence and then convert them all to jpegs, after doing whatever
it is i do i then can use gap to make an mpeg. i can't do any of that
with cinepaint afaik. a problem i have found is that an image created in
xaos is 'out of image resolution bounds' according to gimp, not knowing
how to change that i end up often generating a couple of thousand message
errors :), does this have something to do with the 8 bit resolution
thingy ? (sorry, i am really not technology minded).
cinepaint doesn't seem to have any of the functions gap has ? i fact i
haven't been able to discern what functions it does have that gimp
doesn't, so i'm not sure why one would want to merge ?
Gimp-user mailing list