On Sunday 14 September 2003 12:55, David Burren wrote:
> sam ende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > cinepaint doesn't seem to have any of the functions gap has ? i fact
> > i haven't been able to discern what functions it does have that gimp
> > doesn't, so i'm not sure why one would want to merge ?
> I say again: support for 16(48)-bit images!
ok. other than that though cinepaint isn't all that impressive and adding
every function into gimp is making it into a bit of a monster resource
wise, maybe we could do differnt versions, gimp light or something like
that. ( i'm being flippant, i know :)
Gimp-user mailing list