On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 11:53, Timothy E. Jedlicka - wrk wrote:
On 13 Jan 2004, "Sven" == Sven Neumann wrote:
Sven> Is there a particular reason you are running such an outdated version?
I see this statement a lot - i.e. users using really old versions of Gimp. Would it be reasonable/feasible to add a hook into gimp that checks it's age and gives a warning if it is more than x months old?
Would it possibly be that at gimp.org the latest "stable" version is
1.2.5 and that is what might be included in most distros (not sure
what distros all include, but my RH9 I got was 1.2.something)? And maybe other folks would not want to "risk" using an "unstable" yet
newer version? FWIW, I'm using 2.0pre1 and keeping up with stuff. But I can imagine some would rather wait for a "stable" release...?
Right on! I just moved to FC1 and 1.2.5 is what's there.
_______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user