On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 02:25:07AM -0800, Manish Singh wrote: > A gimp-devel package *must* have a dependency that either directly or > indirectly pulls in glib-devel. If it doesn't, the package's dependency > specification is broken.
> SuSE has a history of being shoddy in this regard, other examples that > have affected gimp are glib-devel not requiring pkg-config, aalib being > linked against slang but not requiring slang-devel, and a few more I > can't recall off the top of my head right now. For Open SuSE 10: # rpm -q -R -p gimp-devel-2.2.8-6.i586.rpm gtk2-devel glib2-devel glibc-devel rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsBzip2) <= 3.0.5-1 # rpm -q -R -p glib2-devel-2.8.1-3.i586.rpm glib2 = 2.8.1 pkgconfig glibc-devel rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libglib-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 rpmlib(PayloadIsBzip2) <= 3.0.5-1 Are you saying the above is incorrect? How so? > Please next time actually read and comprehend what's going on in the > thread instead of sending out poorly researched knee-jerk defenses of > your pet Linux distro. Yeh ... -- Patrick Mansfield _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
