On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Carol Spears wrote:
> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:28:44 -0700
> From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> GIMPUser <Gimpfirstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Please Change the Derogatory Name
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:39:46AM +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
> > As I said before offering to accept patches which made it possible to
> > rebrand the gimp in a clean maintainable way without the need to fork
> > could bring this dicussion to screeching halt until someone shows some
> > code. Isn't that the Free Software way? Look how Ubuntu has different
> > versions which all work together promoting Ubuntu without suggesting those
> > who have different needs should fork the project.
There were people who wanted to use Ubuntu to target different audiences
so without changing what they were the found a way to cooperate and make
Kubuntu and Edubuntu happen. Different ideas but still part of Ubuntu.
> can you expand on this please?
See above, if you need more you will need to explain more clearly.
I wasn't sure your question was necessarily directed at me. I am only
responding because I do not want to ignore you but your message is very
> three different names for Ubuntu or what?
I'm not sure what you mean, could you please rephrase your question.
> please also explain the reason that you target GIMP and not some of the
> other perhaps better funded names of products that are as or more
> offensive than this one here?
This question does not make sense to me. I did not target the gimp, I did
not even start this discussion. All I am really asking is for developers
to consider the possibility of making it easier to rebrand custom versions
of the gimp for different audiences. Is there not something a little bit
more that can be done for those who have issue with the name?
> thanks for your continued effort to do this important thing...
Gimp-user mailing list