If, for you, that is normal between Gimp and external apps that the size of the pasted selection is only pixels and the measured size of the selection is multiplied,
why between photoshop and the same apps with the same file and the same process, result of the pasted selection is at the correct measured size?
Sven Neumann a écrit :
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 17:09 +0100, Monique et Bernard Weill wrote:I am working on Windows XP, GIMP 2.6.7. like this:1- I scan an image in 300 dpi at his real size: A4 and obtain file in Jpeg and/or Tif. 2- I open the file in GIMP. 3- I select part of the image and copy (Ctrl + C) the selection in the Clipboard. And now my problem: Past (Ctrl V) on: - Gimp: the size of the copied selection is good (equal to the original size). - Microsoft program like Powerpoint or OO program like Draw or Inkscape: the size is around multiply by 3!But that is expected. You are copying the pixels over the clipboard. This doesn't say anything about how these pixels are displayed in other applications. Most applications will look at the print-size meta-data of the image in order to determine at what size the image should be displayed. But you are not copying this meta-information when you copy and paste pixels between applications. It should be fairly easy though to adjust the display size in the target application. Sven
_______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user