On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm afraid mitigation, to a large extent, is an illusion. China et al
> will continue to pollute at ever increasing rate. Those increases will
> likely overshadow the mitigation efforts of the developed countries.
>
> http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,druck-461828,00.html
>
> If anybody is wondering what I'm doing here - here's the answer. The
> good folks at RealClimate finally achieved full consensus by refusing
> to pass any of my comments, no matter the content.

Oh dear. Still, mitigation is largely outside the remit, so if you were trying
to post that, no great surprise. You can always post anything rejected by RC
here so the world will know how unjustly you are being treated :-)

-W.

William M Connolley | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/met/wmc/
Climate Modeller, British Antarctic Survey | (01223) 221479

--  
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only.  NERC is subject
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under
the Act.  Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic
records management system.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to