Hello zou, Thursday, May 10, 2007, 9:09:02 AM, you wrote:
zl> I am afraid still not enough, or even worse, a wrong direction. zl> Zou: In the above case, I am sure "B" will be created and destroied when jumping zl> from frame4 to frame14! see testcase: action_execution_order_test6 Whoa, that's a quite complex testcase to verify this... I added a timeline to the Wiki page, for easier reference: http://www.gnashdev.org/wiki/index.php/TimelineControl#Skipping_frames I created exactly the same movie. The sprite *definition* contains this ActionScript code: trace(this+' created in frame '+_parent._currentframe); this.onUnload = function() { trace(this+' removed in frame '+_parent._currentframe); }; I placed three static instances at frames 3, 8, 13 with names "A", "B" and "C" respectively. When running the movie I get this output: _level0.A created in frame 3 _level0.A removed in frame 14 _level0.C created in frame 14 _level0.C removed in frame 1 _level0.A created in frame 3 _level0.A removed in frame 14 _level0.C created in frame 14 _level0.C removed in frame 1 (in a loop, because movie loops back to first frame) As you can see, no life sign from instance "B"... Udo _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
