"Mehul N. Sanghvi" wrote:
>
>
> I vote for "Gnucash 1.3.0 Beta Release 1"
>
> It is a logical progression from 1.2.x rather then skipping straight
> to 1.4.0
>
> Also let us not include the name of a GUI toolkit into release name.
> GnuCash still supports Motif as well as GNOME. Even though it is
> heading towards GNOME, do we want to make it completely GNOME
> centric ? I maybe re-visiting a very old discussion but I have
> recently joined the mailing list. I am unable to run GNOME on my
> system but do have Lesstif. But the fact that GnuCash supports
> Lesstif is what attracted me to it. I have tried CBB, but it GnuCash
> seems easier to work with, especially with the fact that a Scheme
> implementation is used as its extension language.
>
I was just throwing ideas out there... I agree that we shouldn't put the
GUI name in there. However most people assume that Gnucash is only
motif.. this will be first release that people can use the Gnome version
so I want it to be clear the Gnome version is kill of the hill now, or
at least it will be soon.
> Just my $0.02
>
> mehul
> p.s. If I have no choice I guess I will have to find a way to upgrade
> my system to run GNOME somehow.
>
> --
> "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
> who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
> first group; there was less competition there."
> - Indira Gandhi
> stolen from Ben Laurie on the FSB list.
--
Jeremy Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
