Sandeep Heble wrote thus about the points in George Pinto's post: The arguments made to oppose the stadium are feeble and need to be dismissed with the CONTEMPT THEY DESERVE.
COMMENT: I am quite surprised at the phrasing of Sandeep's post. For, it is quite alright to have a difference of opinion (albeit, based on superior and insider information). But, what is the need to treat the opinion of another with CONTEMPT? One notices that politicians (present and past) have contemptuously acted in a Zhalach Pahije fashion and done whatever they wanted. Is this Sandeep post an indicator that this modus operandi is more than likely to continue in the future? If so, what is the difference between the various Alibabas? >From previous behaviour and present indications, it appears that the CONTEMPTUOUS behaviour will be status quo. OR ...as LK Advani would say ..."ipso facto" (:-) just my view jc
