Hi Riyaz, Unfortunately, you cannot find all these features in one framework. As Arthur said, there are some things in gwt-incubator. Some others are in GWT-WL, GWT-SL, Ext GWT, gwt-ext, SmartGWT, etc...
Examples : gwt-incubator : Logging GWT-SL : Spring integration Ext GWT (this is a lib I use so I can tell you more than the other libs) : layouts, look&feels, widgets and MVC Regards -- Miles T. On 18 déc, 15:46, Rob Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Arthur, > So you've assumed responsibility for being the GWT saviour by > educating these developers and saving their project? What makes you > so qualified? You've expressed your opinion (more than once) so why > not leave it at that. How would it appear if someone posted in > response to your every post saying that Arthur is clueless? Or the ZK > guys saying that GWT sucks in their ads that are all over the place. > Everyone is entitled to an opinion by going overboard is really not > necessary. You know what they say about opinions and wanting to give > them... And you've gone out of your way to voice your opinion even no > one asked for it. > > Try to take a deep breath and relax when these libraries are mentioned > and ignore them instead of assuming the role of GWT gatekeeper. There > have been stray email questions on various third party libraries like > GChart and DnD. I don't see you jump in on those threads pointing to > the appropriate forum. > > Rob > > Full disclosure : I am a contributor to gwt-ext by mostly > participating in their forums. > > On Dec 18, 8:54 am, "Arthur Kalmenson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Rob, > > > Judging from cloudcity's response, not everyone is aware of the draw > > backs of these libraries (or, as you put it, my position on them). > > Ignoring an issue is not going to make it go away. I'm letting people > > know what the draw backs of using these libraries are, because a lot > > of people are impressed by the shininess but are unaware of the > > numerous problems. Anyway, I'm not here to start a flame war, I'm just > > trying to warn people before they commit all their resources to these > > libraries. > > > -- > > Arthur Kalmenson > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Rob Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Did anyone ask you opinion on use of third part libs in this thread. > > > We know what your position is on using 3rd party libs and you have > > > made it clear "numerous" times. Repeating the same thing again and > > > again is just adding noise to this group. Gmail has a wonderful filter > > > option and you can set yours to ignore any thread that mentions any > > > lib that you don't care about :) > > > > On Dec 17, 3:34 pm, "Arthur Kalmenson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I'm hoping that a lot of those things will be added to the incubator > > >> in the near future. I've mentioned the request for simpler security > > >> similar to Spring Security's @Secured("ROLE_USER") annotations. Data > > >> binding and validation frameworks are on their way as well, in the > > >> near future. > > > >> I would stay away from ExtGWT or SmartGWT though. > > > >> -- > > >> Arthur Kalmenson > > > >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:54 AM, [email protected] > > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > This does bring up a good point and something that is sourly missing. > > >> > We have cobbled together some very generic type stuff patterned > > >> > (albeit very low in quality) what we used extensively in Eclipse Rich > > >> > Client. Maybe the ExtGWT guys or SmartGWT will come up with > > >> > something. Or if the Eclipse Web Client guys would do GWT.... Or if > > >> > I could find a spare moment or two, I'd take it on. The whole UI > > >> >frameworkbeyond "widgets", like editors, views, menus, actions etc. > > >> > is a sweet spot to be sure that is missing from any of the web > > >> > frameworks, IMHO. > > > >> > On Dec 17, 6:54 am, "Arthur Kalmenson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> There are some things in the incubator for status bars and logging. > > >> >> The rest you would have to do yourself. > > > >> >> -- > > >> >> Arthur Kalmenson > > > >> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Riyaz Mansoor > > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> >> > I'm not looking for rich widget sets (Ext, Smart, etc) but rather is > > >> >> > there a GWTframeworkthat provides basics for aRIA. One that handles > > >> >> > the grunt work such as providing; status bar, xml or other > > >> >> > configurable menu, error logging report, authentication, security > > >> >> > etc > > > >> >> > This maybe reaching for the sky but kinda like what Eclipse or > > >> >> > Netbeans provides as the core platform when developing on those > > >> >> > platforms.- Hide quoted text - > > > >> >> - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
