Michele, thanks for demonstrating the values of Mozilla so clearly in this
thread: making a proposal to reach out to more people, taking feedback from
a range of passionate people, adjusting the proposal into a better one that
respects choice and choice better than the original proposal. Well done!

- David

2017-09-30 0:50 GMT+02:00 Allen Gunn via governance <
[email protected]>:

> +1, thank you very much for clarifying and responding in this fashion.
>
> On 09/29/2017 12:33 PM, Michael Kelly via governance wrote:
> > Thanks for explaining. I understand the problem a lot better and think
> > those are reasonable changes. Thanks for clarifying!
> >
> > - Mike Kelly
> >
> > On 9/29/17 11:51 AM, Michele Warther via governance wrote:
> >> Thank you again for all the feedback and the additional people that
> have reached out to me directly.
> >>
> >> The issue we’re trying to address isn’t about tracking users - it’s
> about our users getting our email at all. More than half of our audience is
> using a web-based email and 90% are receiving HTML email. When people open
> an email, click on links, don’t mark us as spam, filter to the trash etc -
> these actions all contribute to a positive “reputation score” on those mail
> services and ensure that our messages make it into your inbox, not your
> junk mail folder. This reputation score is the measurement of our email
> sending practices and the extent to which we follow the standards
> established by ISPs.
> >>
> >> You can learn more about the implementation and politics of this sort
> of reputation scoring here links [1] [2] [3]
> >>
> >> Unfortunately text emails don’t have the same feedback loops available
> as HTML. A lot of people, of course, consider this to be a feature. But an
> unintended result is the negative effect that zero-interaction signals have
> on our reputation scoring: we have seen an increase in
> greylisting/blacklisting as a direct  result of our text only emails, and
> that typically means we can’t send any email to *anyone* until it gets
> resolved. This is what prompted us to revisit offering text as an option.
> >>
> >> All that said, giving users the ability to choose and respecting those
> choices is core to Mozilla’s values, and in retrospect we proposed this
> change without giving enough consideration to user privacy and agency,
> which was a mistake.
> >>
> >> After hearing and discussing everyone’s feedback, we’d like to propose
> a different approach that will maintain our ability to get relevant
> messages to interested people and a positive reputation.
> >>
> >> People who have subscribed to text-only emails will be contacted once a
> year be with a link to confirm their interest in receiving text emails as
> well as the option to join other lists, update delivery method etc. We
> won’t be tracking any usage via text-only mail, just a reconfirmation
> similar to the double-opt-in process when you first sign-up to receive text
> email. Most importantly we don’t want to be sending you emails you aren’t
> interested in.
> >>
> >> We think this approach will let us work past the reputation-score and
> junk mail filtering problems we’ve had while respecting the wishes of those
> users’ who’ve chosen the zero-feedback text-only option.
> >>
> >> I hope this makes our motivations for the original proposal clear and
> speaks to the concerns many of your have raised and I’d welcome any
> additional questions or clarifications on the approach.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Michele
> >>
> >> [1] http://resources.mailgun.com/email-reputation.html
> >> [2] https://www.talosintelligence.com/reputation_center/support
> >> [3] https://www.senderscore.org/faq/
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> governance mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > governance mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Allen Gunn
> Executive Director, Aspiration
> +1.415.216.7252
> www.aspirationtech.org
>
> Aspiration: "Better Tools for a Better World"
>
> Read our Manifesto: http://aspirationtech.org/publications/manifesto
>
> Twitter:  www.twitter.com/aspirationtech
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
>
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to