+1, thank you very much for clarifying and responding in this fashion.

On 09/29/2017 12:33 PM, Michael Kelly via governance wrote:
> Thanks for explaining. I understand the problem a lot better and think
> those are reasonable changes. Thanks for clarifying!
> 
> - Mike Kelly
> 
> On 9/29/17 11:51 AM, Michele Warther via governance wrote:
>> Thank you again for all the feedback and the additional people that have 
>> reached out to me directly.
>>
>> The issue we’re trying to address isn’t about tracking users - it’s about 
>> our users getting our email at all. More than half of our audience is using 
>> a web-based email and 90% are receiving HTML email. When people open an 
>> email, click on links, don’t mark us as spam, filter to the trash etc - 
>> these actions all contribute to a positive “reputation score” on those mail 
>> services and ensure that our messages make it into your inbox, not your junk 
>> mail folder. This reputation score is the measurement of our email sending 
>> practices and the extent to which we follow the standards established by 
>> ISPs. 
>>
>> You can learn more about the implementation and politics of this sort of 
>> reputation scoring here links [1] [2] [3]
>>
>> Unfortunately text emails don’t have the same feedback loops available as 
>> HTML. A lot of people, of course, consider this to be a feature. But an 
>> unintended result is the negative effect that zero-interaction signals have 
>> on our reputation scoring: we have seen an increase in 
>> greylisting/blacklisting as a direct  result of our text only emails, and 
>> that typically means we can’t send any email to *anyone* until it gets 
>> resolved. This is what prompted us to revisit offering text as an option. 
>>
>> All that said, giving users the ability to choose and respecting those 
>> choices is core to Mozilla’s values, and in retrospect we proposed this 
>> change without giving enough consideration to user privacy and agency, which 
>> was a mistake.
>>
>> After hearing and discussing everyone’s feedback, we’d like to propose a 
>> different approach that will maintain our ability to get relevant messages 
>> to interested people and a positive reputation.
>>
>> People who have subscribed to text-only emails will be contacted once a year 
>> be with a link to confirm their interest in receiving text emails as well as 
>> the option to join other lists, update delivery method etc. We won’t be 
>> tracking any usage via text-only mail, just a reconfirmation similar to the 
>> double-opt-in process when you first sign-up to receive text email. Most 
>> importantly we don’t want to be sending you emails you aren’t interested in.
>>
>> We think this approach will let us work past the reputation-score and junk 
>> mail filtering problems we’ve had while respecting the wishes of those 
>> users’ who’ve chosen the zero-feedback text-only option.
>>
>> I hope this makes our motivations for the original proposal clear and speaks 
>> to the concerns many of your have raised and I’d welcome any additional 
>> questions or clarifications on the approach.
>>
>> Best,
>> Michele
>>
>> [1] http://resources.mailgun.com/email-reputation.html
>> [2] https://www.talosintelligence.com/reputation_center/support
>> [3] https://www.senderscore.org/faq/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> governance mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>>
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
> 


-- 

Allen Gunn
Executive Director, Aspiration
+1.415.216.7252
www.aspirationtech.org

Aspiration: "Better Tools for a Better World"

Read our Manifesto: http://aspirationtech.org/publications/manifesto

Twitter:  www.twitter.com/aspirationtech

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to