On Monday 21 August 2006 22:52, Ian Cheong wrote:
> >I can understand Andrews' frustration when on one hand he is regaled
> >with GPs imploring him to make installations simpler than pressing a
> >toilet flush and a few on the other hand asking for greater
> >complexity. However give Andrew credit, he always listens to points
> >well made and he has already agreed to address Horst's concerns.
>
> No question about it, if you want GPs to use it, it had better be as
> easy as a toaster, unless you want to send people on-site for free to
> do the installs (like path labs do).
The mixed metaphors here are overwhelming. a toilet flush may have one choice
or offer two choices; my toaster (which is not new in any way, like about 10
years old) has a dial control, three buttons and a main on control.
In fact I can't tell you what the last button is for on the toaster.
The man from the path lab has been known to ring repetitively when installing
at our place, but I have beaten him as I have a copy of the download stuff
now.
Just remember that the same thing that has stalled Horst's install has stalled
my use of Argus when I would rather it was goingand collecting mail.
Liz
--
Sorry. I just realized this sentence makes no sense :)
-- Ian Main
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
