HI Richard - I would love to agree- still waiting for a demo of profile- Stephan from profile is waiting for the next version before he gives it to me. Why do you favour Profile so much? Why can other software not improve?
I would guess the underlying program is important- Functionality- support and stability are key elements. I wonder if any one will be able to keep up with the wish list I have compiled already? Regards James -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Terry Sent: Friday, 29 June 2007 10:39 AM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Wish list- Medical Software On Thursday 28 June 2007 23:56, James wrote: > Hi All > > > > A software development fellow (medtech type) is visiting. Do you have any > wish list items you might like to recommend for medical software? Basic mis-understanding of medical software design. It is the functional paradigm which makes medical software work/not work. There is only one program on the market with any intelligence and a good functional paradigm and that's Profile. Medtech is functionally hopeless and to think you can improve it by a wish list misses the point. Ditto for MDW and best practice (though much better than MDW). Bolt on solutions never work. Regards Richard > > > > The fellow is a software development consultant from India. He is visiting > me next week. When we spoke to day he said he is interested in discussing > improvements I can suggest to make MT32 the best product - > > > > I want cutting edge medical software- I would like to see that!- LOL > > > > Any wish lists- dreams will be considered. > > > > Cheers James _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
