*That is better. What we are seeing is, when a congress supporter criticize
CPI-M or the Left, he himself claims impartial----- just a trick to avoid
questions back.... *
**
*You are better in that case *
**
*regards *
*Rasheed *



On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:34 AM, damodar prasad <[email protected]>wrote:

> A.Rasheed,
> Thank you for helping me to know where I stand. Now I may like to sit there
> as well.
> btw, the CPM has become incredible, we know (as in incredible India)?
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Abdul Rasheed <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  *Why dont we dialogue with Congress?.. a party which has a better vision
>> of future than the anachronistic views of Left (non-traditonal also
>> included)
>> dear viswanath, better to avoid a debate with CPM votaries. It is not
>> going to help us nor them...*
>>
>> *Mr. D.Prasad, this statement underlines where you stand. *
>> **
>> *What is the better vision of congress? *
>> *More than 70% of our peoples' daily income is less than 20 Rupees. Where
>> is "Ghareebe Ghadawo" now? *
>> *"incredible India"*
>> **
>> *regards *
>> *Rasheed *
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:24 AM, damodar prasad <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Viswanath,
>>> See, If Left and CPM in particualr wants to really do some serious
>>> introspection, then the trends and indications has quite no: of lessons for
>>> them to internalize and practice..
>>>
>>> However, nothing like that is going to happen.
>>>
>>> Btw, many CPM people want non-CPMs to elaborate on the verdict so that
>>> they dont have to face the ire of top brass while things are being reported
>>> and argued from the "Other" side.
>>>
>>> Descedant Marxists may appear disguised  as Pro-CPM and argue so that
>>> contrary arguments are placed vehmently.
>>>
>>> I dont think Viswanath nor me have no such interests to argue for
>>> anyside and mind that  when CPM state commt. is discussing the verdict, it
>>> is better to listen to what CPM has to say on the verdict.
>>>
>>> *For so long, Left and CPM was always loacted on the one-side of the
>>> discussion.The arguments Pro/Anti/Non but was with the CPM. The Left and CPM
>>> reigned. The dialogues was with the CPM & Left.*
>>> **
>>> *High time, we remove CPM from there. Why dont we dialogue with
>>> Congress?.. a party which has a better vision of future than the
>>> anachronistic views of Left (non-traditonal also included)
>>> dear viswanath, better to avoid a debate with CPM votaries. It is not
>>> going to help us nor them...*
>>> **
>>> *damodar prasad*
>>> **
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:59 AM, C.K. Vishwanath <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -the left democratic politics of  kerala  led by CPIM has got a severe
>>>> set back.the switching of the character of kerala voter-this analysis won't
>>>> give much confidence to the CPIM.Even ashok mitra has written so(the
>>>> Telegraph).The real shock is from kannur and vadakara-The committed party
>>>> votes are  no longer in the CPIM account. ,the active supporters of the
>>>> party are searching for new alternatives.this is really a challenging
>>>> scenario.from the days of 1940s,culcutta thesis,emergency,and other local
>>>> issues never affected the party vote bank of these areas.PARTY is 
>>>> total-this
>>>> is lost.the contradiction between party and people is sharpening.This 
>>>> impact
>>>> is so deep in the history of CPIM.
>>>> Just before the election,the cpim central committee member A.k.
>>>> padmabhan given an interview to world socialist web in which he said that
>>>> the administrative power which we got has no meaning at all.And this is not
>>>> a political power.The problem is that they are sill failing to give a good
>>>> governance to the people.
>>>> Even people's democratic path is far off.And socialism is very far
>>>> off.He underlined the comments of EMS in 1957.And globalisation process has
>>>> cut off the funds getting from the central govt.
>>>> there are many confusions-pragmatic electoral games,governance etc in
>>>> the political praxis of cpim.
>>>>
>>>> --- On Sun, 24/5/09, Abdul Rasheed <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > From: Abdul Rasheed <[email protected]>
>>>> > Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: Vaikom Viswan and Little Bo-Peep
>>>> > To: [email protected]
>>>> > Date: Sunday, 24 May, 2009, 9:39 PM
>>>>  > Mr. D. Prasad,
>>>> >
>>>> > You taking out just a
>>>> > figure from the article of Vaikom Viswan and defining it.
>>>> > As you said, a small swing can change the victory to one
>>>> > side and that is what happened here.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Of course, there
>>>> > was erosion in CPI-M vote base (internal problems
>>>> > and divisions are the problem)  and some LDF
>>>> > partners also vote against them to an extend.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > A large scale voters
>>>> > from BJP did vote for Congress
>>>> > (comparing with last
>>>> > time it is above 6 % - but that calculation is not right
>>>> > because last time, BJP got more percentage due to personal
>>>> > votes of Rajagopal and PC thomas of IFDP -  Anyway we can
>>>> > say approximately they lost between 4-5 % votes).
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Actually PDP do not
>>>> > have much vote share - now their vote bank is actually with
>>>> > NDF and NDF supported UDF.
>>>> > present NDF cadres are
>>>> > once PDP/ISS workers.
>>>> >
>>>> > A section of people did
>>>> > not vote for LDF due to different reasons (They did not
>>>> > beleive in Third front, They didn't like Adwani and
>>>> > Modi and for them Dr.Manmohan was a better choice)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Minorities (A section of
>>>> > muslims and christians) worked against LDF
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > But even after all these
>>>> > problems worked against CPI-M (LDF), if there is only 2
>>>> > lacks vote they lost from last time, sure, CPI-M still
>>>> > remains STRONG.
>>>> >
>>>> > regards
>>>> >
>>>> > Rasheed
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:44 PM,
>>>> > damodar prasad <[email protected]>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > If any one has missed reading this Devika's witty
>>>> > and sharp take on people's verdict for the 2009 LS
>>>> > elections, pls. follow the link:
>>>> >
>>>> http://kafila.org/2009/05/19/vaikom-viswan-and-little-bo-peep/#more-2607
>>>> >
>>>> > a precise excerpt from this is as follows:
>>>> >
>>>> > The CPM leadership doesn’t
>>>> > seemed to have learned anything from this thrashing, though.
>>>> > The LDF convenor, Vaikom Viswan, observes that the CPM’s
>>>> > share of the votes have reduced only by 2,28,638 and
>>>> > therefore its mass base remains intact. Well, we would like
>>>> > to remind him that there is little consolation to be drawn
>>>> > from this. It is a well-known fact that the LDF and the UDF
>>>> > are more or less equally matched and a small swing can alter
>>>> > the balance. This time the swing was certainly not small,
>>>> > compared with earlier elections, which is something the
>>>> > leaders of the CPM have admitted.And besides, the erosion of
>>>> > support was most evident in CPM’s core areas of strength;
>>>> > therefore it is not as if the non-political strata decided
>>>> > to vote UDF. Voters in core areas usually are loyal, while
>>>> > the support received in non-core areas may be driven by
>>>> > other, more local calculations. This is evident to the most
>>>> > ordinary voter but Vaikom Viswan and his peers are so used
>>>> > to thinking that the rest of us Malayalees are morons —
>>>> > and hence continues dish out such weak argument.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      Explore and discover exciting holidays and getaways with Yahoo!
>>>> India Travel http://in.travel.yahoo.com/
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to