Plz view the link: Does it look more than just anti-'pink'? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEbD2aXs-XU
On Aug 12, 7:18 am, ranju radha <[email protected]> wrote: > the question that WE forgot to ask is (we often ask this question before > entering into commn with anyone) > vwhat is the caste of pink? > ideological indeed (and i hate those politically correct souls) > > advani got it clearly > venu seems confused (for him pink is purple).. > purple is not pink (not using pink for pub)..that doesnt mean that purple > will not go to pub... purple's position is differnt which pink cannot > see/imagine and respect. > > and one who fought against moral policing was a dalit woman whom WE all must > be knowng .. her name is chitralekha > pink does not address her.. she is not pink, she need not... hence the need > to talk abt different colours even in the context of moral policing.. > this does not undermine the relevanc of pink..it has its own role... but one > cannot stop there ..the whole "feminism" seems to hv been given a stop press > order (pink kanda feminism pole ennu VKN type mozhi) > ... womanisms will challenge it.. thta is how we make a better and colourful > world.. i love a colourful world.. > > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:25 AM, ranju radha <[email protected]> wrote: > > haha > > that is why i like politicians..nothing goes "above their head"... > > ;-)) > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:59 PM, ANIL THARAYATH <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > >> this went above my head will get back... > > >> On Aug 11, 4:04 pm, ranju radha <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > i admire Advani in this regard > >> > he understood the true politics and his vote bank in pink chaddi and > >> > immediately gave a statemnt in support > >> > that is why though i disagree with his political ideology, i am with him > >> > (politicians) > >> > in the sense, i respect politicians > >> > they know the pulse of the people and their ideological/political > >> position > > >> > intellectuals/academicns/activists should learn from politicians > >> > best > > >> > 2009/8/11 ANIL THARAYATH <[email protected]> > > >> > > And I think that the identity of the group which initiated this was a > >> > > urban, english speaking group primarily to which the symbols of > >> > > resistance were a subjective part of their day to day lives. They have > >> > > not done anything on behalf of any one but acted on a specific > >> > > incident. Anyway would like to hear ranjit's views too (I would like > >> > > to position my self like this for the time being). > > >> > > On Aug 11, 1:31 pm, venukm <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > Hi, > >> > > > Thanks for this; > >> > > > I visited the blog and posted a comment somewhat like this though a > >> > > > few sentences are being added now: > > >> > > > That pink chaddi campaign had actually brought in to sharp focus the > >> > > > ugliest moral policing by a chauvinist Sri Ram Sene over women, > >> finds > >> > > > no mention in the post. > >> > > > The distinction you make between pink and purple makes no sense, > >> > > > especially when one finds that such sparing treatment was not > >> > > > available from the Muthalik Moral Brigade to purple women either. > >> > > > ( Lot of college going girls were harassed too, even leading to the > >> > > > tragic suicide of one poor village girl from > >> > > > the hill tracts of Dakshina Kannada district for having been seen > >> > > > walking home with a Muslim friend as she got down from a bus coming > >> > > > from Mangalore, where she was studying..many many such incidents > >> > > > preceded the Mangalore 'pub attack') > > >> > > > Perhaps the reason why Nisha Susan and others opted for a > >> provocative > >> > > > but non violent campaign like Pink Chaddi which described itself as > >> > > > 'as a consortium of pub going,loose women', might be looked in non- > >> > > > partisan ways as well. The assumption here could be that only > >> "loose" > >> > > > women could do something daring, and take the risk; "Loose" perhaps > >> > > > means and includes all who could condemn the cowardliness of those > >> who > >> > > > speak in tongue- in cheek ways. For example, there are quite a lot > >> of > >> > > > apologists for Ram Sene. They will never publicly express against > >> > > > women's claim for equality, but will often take recourse to the > >> alibi > >> > > > of tradition and culture. > > >> > > > You people try to bring the distinction (Pink vs Purple) in the > >> > > > most inopportune way, as far as Pink Chaddi Campaign is concerned.. > >> > > > This is equivalent to saying in other ways that the attacks by Ram > >> > > > Sene were even justifiable had they been directed only against the > >> > > > 'Pink' culture (In the popular parlance, this is already named Pub > >> > > > Culture), and hence, the non-pink women will have/have/ had no > >> issue > >> > > > with the Ram Sene. > > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > > > (Venu). > > >> > > > On 9 Aug, 17:18, Ranjit Ranjit <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > wonderful > >> > > > > love it > > >> > > > > വെള്ളൈ അഴകേ, എന് ഉള്ളം > >> > > > > ഉനക്കേ...< > >>http://vellezhuthth.blogspot.com/2009/07/blog-post_07.html> > >> > > > > < > > >>http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_QilWYA4A09o/SlN-j1-0aQI/AAAAAAAAAiU/bCeKpaI...> > > >> > > > > പിങ്ക് ചഡ്ഡി പ്രചാരണപ്രവര്ത്തനത്തിന് നേതൃത്വം നല്കിയ നിഷാസൂസന് > >> > > > > പറഞ്ഞതുപോലെ പിങ്ക് സ്വകാര്യവും സ്വതന്ത്രവുമായ ഒരു നിറമാണെന്ന് > >> > > സമ്മതിച്ചാല് > >> > > > > തന്നെ അത് പ്രതിനിധീകരിക്കുന്നത് മുഴുവന് സ്ത്രീകളെയുമാണോ എന്നൊരു > >> സംശയം > >> > > > > കുറച്ചു കഴിഞ്ഞിട്ടാണ് തലയില് ‘അറുപതു വാട്ടുള്ള സൂര്യനായി’ > >> കത്തിയത്. > >> > > > > അപ്പോഴേയ്ക്കും കറുത്ത പെണ്ണിനെ പിങ്ക് ഒരു തരത്തിലും > >> > > > > സൂചിപ്പിക്കുന്നില്ലെന്നും അവളുടെ നിറം വൈലറ്റാണെന്നും പറഞ്ഞ ആലിസ് > >> > > > > വാക്കറെപ്പറ്റി നിഖിലാഹെന്റി (പച്ചക്കുതിര) എഴുതിക്കളഞ്ഞു. > >> ‘വുമണിസ’ത്തിന് > >> > > > > മലയാളത്തില് വ്യാഖ്യാനങ്ങളും ഉണ്ടായി. ‘ഒരേ രക്തം’ എന്നൊക്കെയാണല്ലോ > >> > > ആലങ്കാരിക > >> > > > > ഭാഷയില് നമ്മള് പറഞ്ഞു പഠിച്ചത് . എന്നിട്ടും പെണ്ച്ചോരയ്ക്കു > >> > > > > മാത്രമിങ്ങനെയുള്ള രണ്ടു വ്യാഖ്യാനഭേദങ്ങള് ആരെയാണ് > >> > > > > ഇരുത്തിച്ചിന്തിപ്പിക്കാത്തത്? പിങ്കിന്റെ പ്രസാദാത്മകത്വവും > >> വരേണ്യതയും > >> > > > > നിഗൂഢതയും, ഇരുണ്ട തൊലിയില് ചതഞ്ഞ രക്തം നിറം പിടിപ്പിക്കുന്ന > >> > > നീലയ്ക്കില്ല. > >> > > > > പ്രകടമായും ഞാറപ്പഴത്തിന്റെ വൈലറ്റ് വിഷാദാത്മകത്വത്തിന്റെ നിറമാണ്. > >> > > ലൈംഗികമായ > >> > > > > നിഗൂഢത അതിലില്ല. മ്ലാനമുഖമുള്ള നോവാണ് അതിന്റെ പ്രത്യക്ഷാനുഭവം.. > > >> > > > > An interesting post, athttp:// > >> > > vellezhuthth.blogspot.com/2009/07/blog-post_07.html > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Carmel Christy > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Ranjit > > >> > -- > >> > " The so called caste-hindus are bitterly opposed to the depressed class > >> > using a public tank not because they really believe that the water will > >> be > >> > thereby spoiled or will evaporate but because they are afraid of losing > >> > their superiority of caste and of equality being established between the > >> > former and the latter. We are resorting to this satyagraha not becasue > >> we > >> > believe that the water of this particular tank has any exceptional > >> > qualities, but to establish our natural rights as citizens and human > >> > beings." > > >> > - Dr B.R. Ambedkar, Mahad Satyagraha Conference, December 25th , 1927 > > > -- > > " The so called caste-hindus are bitterly opposed to the depressed class > > using a public tank not because they really believe that the water will be > > thereby spoiled or will evaporate but because they are afraid of losing > > their superiority of caste and of equality being established between the > > former and the latter. We are resorting to this satyagraha not becasue we > > believe that the water of this particular tank has any exceptional > > qualities, but to establish our natural rights as citizens and human > > beings." > > > - Dr B.R. Ambedkar, Mahad Satyagraha Conference, December 25th , 1927 > > -- > " The so called caste-hindus are bitterly opposed to the depressed class > using a public tank not because they really believe that the water will be > thereby spoiled or will evaporate but because they are afraid of losing > their superiority of caste and of equality being established between the > former and the latter. We are resorting to this satyagraha not becasue we > believe that the water of this particular tank has any exceptional > qualities, but to establish our natural rights as citizens and human > beings." > > - Dr B.R. Ambedkar, Mahad Satyagraha Conference, ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
