On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:10 AM, heasley <[email protected]> wrote: > Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 10:59:59AM -0400, Christopher Morrow: > > > Suggested text: > > > > > > BGP speakers in a direct peering relationship MUST only accept and > honor > > > BGP announcements carrying the BLACKHOLE community if the announced > > > prefix is covered by a shorter prefix for which the neighboring > > > network is authorized to advertise. In topologies where a Route Server > > > or other distant-peer relationships, BGP speaker SHOULD accept and > honor > > > BGP announcements under the same conditions. > > repeating myself, but it is perfectly reasonable to accept a BH route > equal to the aggregate ("shorter prefix"). >
I don't disagree... I sent a note (will send it shortly) with integrated suggestions.. let's see how that works? (few mins to gen text from xml still)
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
