On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:10:42PM +0000, heasley wrote:
> Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 10:59:59AM -0400, Christopher Morrow:
> > > Suggested text:
> > >
> > > BGP speakers in a direct peering relationship MUST only accept and honor
> > > BGP announcements carrying the BLACKHOLE community if the announced
> > > prefix is covered by a shorter prefix for which the neighboring
> > > network is authorized to advertise. In topologies where a Route Server
> > > or other distant-peer relationships, BGP speaker SHOULD accept and honor
> > > BGP announcements under the same conditions.
>
> repeating myself, but it is perfectly reasonable to accept a BH route
> equal to the aggregate ("shorter prefix").
Correct, text changed to; "...prefix is covered by an equal or shorter
prefix for which the neighboring..."
Thanks,
Job
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
