Brandon replied to me:
> You could treat the battlesuit platoon much the same way that the
> US Army used independent tank companies (or even platoons) attached
> to infantry companies.

That was one idea. The US wrote unclassified manuals for the M8 
in light/heavy operations before that vehicle got cancelled. Or
an organic heavier element in light infantry, like anti-armor 
platoons/companies with their HMMWVs and TOWs, or like mortars. 

Either way, the battalion commander must decide if the heavy 
stuff stays concentrated under central control or gets broken 
up to reinforce the subordinate maneuver units. Concentration
is often good tactics and easier on logistics. Breaking them 
up gives more power to the subordinates who might need it.

So there is a very good case to have as many maneuver units in
the battlesuit platoon as there are maneuver units in the light
infantry battalion, i.e. three. On the other hand, I don't want
to have fewer than four suits in each squad (two teams of two).

A 9-suit platoon has 24 troops and 40 tons/$5.2M of vehicles.
A 14-suit platoon has 40 troops and 64 tons/$8.5M of vehicles,
with one more squad, a deputy commander, and a second C3I van.
Without the transport trucks, that becomes 13 and 22 tons,
respectively. 

> > On paper, no problem at all. In the field, I wonder. Troops are
> > better in stressful conditions if there is good unit cohesion. 
> 
> If there is a clear chain of command, my suggestion should work.

So there are Private Pete, Corporal Charles and Sergeant Sam
in the platoon. On Monday they do two-suit teams and Pete 
reports to Charles. On Tuesday it is three-suit teams and 
Pete reports directly to Sam. At 0-dark-30 on Wednesday the 
enemy pulls a surprise and Charles shouts for his team to 
counterattack. 

So what does Pete do now? On paper the chain of command is 
clear. In the confusion, even clear things get difficult.

Regards,
Onno
_______________________________________________
GurpsNet-L mailing list <[email protected]>
http://mail.sjgames.com/mailman/listinfo/gurpsnet-l

Reply via email to