On Feb 19, 2009, at 15:27, Arthus Erea wrote:
> > I think this argument really encounters some dangerous thoughts. > > Not only are you saying that a review by a committer is needed, but > you're saying that not all committers are allowed to provide such > review. > > Translation: Unless I or one of my pals approves of something, it's > not part of Habari. Nonsense. 1) The pool of committers is now too large to be considered merely me and my pals. 2) The committers have a range of skills, so that some of them are qualified to review code commits, and others are qualified to review design commits, and others are qualified to review documentation commits. This is simple division of labor, not excluding certain people from being reviewers. Please don't see conspiracy where there is none. -- Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it. Mahatma Ghandi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
