On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 08:11:27AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ? 8 mai 2020 14:25 +02, Willy Tarreau: > > >> > Let's increase the timeout to see if it has a chance to finish, no ? > >> > > >> > >> yes > > > > OK now pushed. It's really annoying to work blindly like this. The > > build model Travis uses is broken by design. Requiring to commit > > something for testing is utterly wrong. And doing so within the > > project that's supposed to being test is further wrong. We already > > have 44 patches only on .travis.yml! If this continues like this, > > I predict that a "pre-CI" solution will appear to test if your > > change is likely to trigger a travis error before it gets merged... > > You can push changes to a (throwable) branch instead.
Good point, that can also be a solution. But it remains completely hackish. It's basically abusing a versioning system to use it as a messaging system to indicate "please build with this". Willy
