or we'd better move SSL_LIB, SSL_INC to build-ssl.sh script пт, 15 мая 2020 г. в 15:09, Илья Шипицин <[email protected]>:
> probably, you also need to unset SSL_LIB and SSL_INC > > > > btw, I got an answer how to grant travis-ci rights (for triggering build > manually) > > https://travis-ci.community/t/undocumented-require-admin-permissions/8530 > > > пт, 15 мая 2020 г. в 14:57, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>: > >> Hi, >> >> I've created https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/630 >> With this change the build passed successfully for 5 mins and 7 secs for >> ARM64. >> >> Please let me know if you prefer me to send it as an attached .patch file >> here. (I haven't used `git format-patch` before :-/). >> >> Martin >> >> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:38 PM Илья Шипицин <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> сб, 9 мая 2020 г. в 11:45, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 08:11:27AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: >>>> > ? 8 mai 2020 14:25 +02, Willy Tarreau: >>>> > >>>> > >> > Let's increase the timeout to see if it has a chance to finish, >>>> no ? >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> >>>> > >> yes >>>> > > >>>> > > OK now pushed. It's really annoying to work blindly like this. The >>>> > > build model Travis uses is broken by design. Requiring to commit >>>> > > something for testing is utterly wrong. And doing so within the >>>> > > project that's supposed to being test is further wrong. We already >>>> > > have 44 patches only on .travis.yml! If this continues like this, >>>> > > I predict that a "pre-CI" solution will appear to test if your >>>> > > change is likely to trigger a travis error before it gets merged... >>>> > >>>> > You can push changes to a (throwable) branch instead. >>>> >>>> Good point, that can also be a solution. But it remains completely >>>> hackish. It's basically abusing a versioning system to use it as a >>>> messaging system to indicate "please build with this". >>>> >>>> Willy >>>> >>> >>> >>> I created several topics (no answer yet). >>> >>> as for travis-ci rights, it's totally undocumented. but I suspect travis >>> grants >>> rights based on github rights. i.e. github admin becomes travis admin as >>> well. >>> >>> https://travis-ci.community/t/arm64-fails-with-non-clear-reason/8529 >>> >>> https://travis-ci.community/t/undocumented-require-admin-permissions/8530 >>> >>> >>> https://travis-ci.community/t/undocumented-operation-requires-create-request-access-to-repository/8528 >>> >>> >>
