-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Yeah I do agree plugin authors get the short end of the stick compared to mod makers, but the attitude some of them take... quite frankly stinks.
I have always found interaction with people like Alfred pleasent, I dunno what you guys are saying but maybe you should be a but more respectfull/polite and you will get much further than with this "we demand this, gimme gimme" attitude some of the members of this list have. Maybe you can be a bit more proactive, and get a bunch of plugin authors together. Create a professional and polite detailed proposal of what you guys want with examples and perhaps even implementations. Valve might turn around and say, "no we aint doing it" but it's going to get you further than the attitude some of you guys are taking. On 3/2/06, Kamran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can't really blame them; if I was a plugin author, and a new game > didn't support all the things the /old/ game did, I'd be pretty mad. It > would seem like logic to me that Valve would include all the good stuff > from CS 1.6 that you'd /imagine/ would carry over to a /new version of > the same game/? If you're going to make a new game, based off the old > one, wouldn't you include the same or BETTER plugin capability? Also, > considering CS 1.6 has sooooooo many mods, you'd think that it'd be a > no-brainer. Extra work sometimes goes a long way. > > Benjamin Davison wrote: > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > I'm not going to bother getting in an argument here. > > > > But if Valve treats you so bad, why don't you vote with your feet and > > develop plugins for any other number of games? > > > > Not gonna crap up the list, always happens when a couple of plugin > authors > > with bad attitudes turn up with a bone to grind. > > > > On 3/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Benjamin Davison wrote: > >> > >>> -- > >>> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > >>> It's not about plugins, he is asking how todo it in a mod. > >>> > >>> > >> The response I made was in agreement to someone who was talking about > >> the SDK and plugins. This is the hlcoders list and is to do with *all* > >> half-life coding, whether they are mods or plugins. > >> > >>> Most of the plugin authors on this list have a bad attitude and need > to > >>> straighten that out first. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> LOL. I take it from your bad attitude you must be one too... > >> > >> > >> Matt. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >> please visit: > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > - Benjamin Davison > > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders > > > > > > > > -- > Kamran A > Get Firefox! Safer, Faster, Better. > <http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=0&t=85> > Down with Internet Explorer! Say "NO!" to Spyware! Use Firefox > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders > > -- - Benjamin Davison -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
