On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 00:02 -0500, Jorge Rodriguez wrote:
> Presumably they can answer my question, because one of them removed the
> function and knows why it was done. I expect that the answer is that
> returning a pass-by-reference copy constructed Vector is much slower
> then normalizing the Vector in place, and they wanted to force
> programmers to use the faster function by removing the old one. Or, if
> they have another explination that works, I'd be happy too. Nobody on
> this list has answered the "why" part of my question, they've just given
> me cruft that I already know.

I presume that if you've already answered your own question, there's no
point in asking it.


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders

Reply via email to