On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 00:02 -0500, Jorge Rodriguez wrote: > Presumably they can answer my question, because one of them removed the > function and knows why it was done. I expect that the answer is that > returning a pass-by-reference copy constructed Vector is much slower > then normalizing the Vector in place, and they wanted to force > programmers to use the faster function by removing the old one. Or, if > they have another explination that works, I'd be happy too. Nobody on > this list has answered the "why" part of my question, they've just given > me cruft that I already know.
I presume that if you've already answered your own question, there's no point in asking it. _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders

