> we've heard PB's side? oh, you mean the sudden rant on their news page?
> i'm sorry, but i am still waiting for the explanation from the PB side...
Jesus Christ, you call that a rant?! You might want to go back and read it
again... There was no ranting involved.
> Either:
> 1. Tony went to Valve to ask them to finance PB (either by outright buying
> them, or by funding them). Valve said no or didn't respond or did not
> respond IN TIME. Tony threw a fit.
> 2. Tony keeps asking for support from Valve (btw, this isn't "answering
> questions" probably more like having a gander at the source or asking for
> new APIs in the SDK). Valve said no or didn't respond or didn't respond IN
> TIME. Tony threw a fit.
> 3. Both
I'm not sure where you're getting this "threw a fit" nonsense. In every
communication from Tony, direct or public, I've found him to be nothing but
reasonable, if a little head-strong. It's this childish, rather pointedly
poisonous rhetoric like you've got there that really chaps my hide, regardless
of how I feel about the situation. Throwing in this "Tony threw a fit" stuff
and the "rant" news post at http://www.punkbuster.com/news.html is completely
off-base, unnecessary, and I'd venture to say out-right false. If you're going
to discuss an issue rationally, at least be fair about it...
Eric (the Deacon remix)
http://www.firekite.com
