Depends on the controller really. Some are as easy as putting in the
new hdd and hitting a button, but they're expensive.

On 4/29/09, msleeper <[email protected]> wrote:
> Right because restoring from RAID is a walk in the park.
>
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:00 -0500, Cc2iscooL wrote:
>> But that's too much work for us lazy server admins.
>>
>> On 4/29/09, msleeper <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Yeah I have to agree, this whole RAID thing is a bit overkill. Your hard
>> > drive dies? Pay your host the $20 to replace your drive and re-install.
>> > It's a game server, it will take like 30 minutes.
>> >
>> > On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 06:51 -0700, Robert Whelan wrote:
>> >> Its a game server...lol 10K SAS 146GB would do you fine. Otherwise a WD
>> >> Black
>> >>
>> >> I have 13 servers easily running off ours (Dual Xeon 5335 Quad Core
>> >> Clovertown Processors)
>> >>
>> >> Create an Image, you can always upgrade if needed...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________
>> >> From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> >> To: [email protected]; Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
>> >> <[email protected]>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:01:25 AM
>> >> Subject: Re: [hlds] Harddrives which to choose
>> >>
>> >> Ack, replying to my reply, it seems I went off on a different tnagent
>> >> than
>> >> what was asked.
>> >>
>> >> You have a fairly *beefy server.  I would not make the disk subsystem
>> >> the
>> >> choke point for future growth.  I would also not go overboard with
>> >> disks
>> >> or expensive RAID sets.  I would recommend 10K SAS (146/300GB) in a
>> >> simple
>> >> RAID1.  I would start with some perf counters Disk Read, Disk Writes,
>> >> Disk
>> >> Queue, CPU and you can grow your server knowing the impact as you grow.
>> >> You can always add more disks later.  This is, of course, just my
>> >> opinion
>> >> and opinions will vary upon everyones current experince.
>> >>
>> >> Any idea how many servers and expected clients/connections?  Or did I
>> >> miss
>> >> this in the thread?
>> >>
>> >> X
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: [email protected]
>> >>
>> >> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:14:37
>> >> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing
>> >> list<[email protected]>
>> >> Subject: Re: [hlds] Harddrives which to choose
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> IMO, RAID1 would be sufficient especially with the IOPs current
>> >> SAS/SCSI
>> >> or even SATA drives provide.  If RAID5 is required for critical uptime
>> >> then I would go as far as to suggest RAID6 just because of the shorter
>> >> rebuild time and higher success rate for rebuilds as there are 2 parity
>> >> stripes to build from.  There are fairly cheap SAS/SATA cards
>> >> (Adaptec/3ware/Areca) as a solution but are the extra avalable writes
>> >> required?  RAID10 is just too expensive a solution for an app that has
>> >> small writes/reads.  RAID1, IMO, is sufficient...why not use VMware to
>> >> copy/move a VM each night off a JBOD or RAID1 so, in a pinch, downtime
>> >> could be reduced to minutes, depending on hardware failure point...
>> >> Without the performance degradation of disk rebuilds.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Donnie Newlove <[email protected]>
>> >>
>> >> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:10:44
>> >> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing
>> >> list<[email protected]>
>> >> Subject: Re: [hlds] Harddrives which to choose
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Is there really any reason to use expensive setups when it comes to
>> >> storage? The harddrive is barley used at all except when the server
>> >> change level but the clients have to do that as well so it's not like
>> >> they have to wait for the server, the server will be finished in time
>> >> even with an average consumer drive, there is no reason it would not
>> >> be.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:50 PM, mdma <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > Hi everyone, this is my 1st post here, i usually sit back and just
>> >> > read
>> >> > what's going on, scanning it for useful information.
>> >> > I need some help regarding hard drives. I'm going to be running a
>> >> > dedicated server soon and want to know which you guys think are
>> >> > better
>> >> > for the job.
>> >> > The box will be running at first a couple of websites, small mysql
>> >> > databases, and then of course mainly game servers.
>> >> > The websites and database etc will be moved from this box to another
>> >> > down the line, and it will then only run game servers.
>> >> > My Box Specs are 1U
>> >> > 2 x Quad Core Xeons
>> >> > 8GB DDR2
>> >> > 250GB Seagate CUDA ES, 7200rpm 32mb cache, with NCQ hard drives.
>> >> >
>> >> > Should i be worried about the performance of these hard drives under
>> >> > load, running multiple game servers etc, or should i upgrade them to
>> >> > Seagate Cheetah 15k rpm SAS drives, or 10k rpm Raptors.
>> >> > I have been told by some that the 10k rpm Raptors perform quite well,
>> >> > but i would like the opinions of you guys to help me decide on the
>> >> > upgrade path.
>> >> > I would hate to put all this time into setting everything up, only to
>> >> > have the hard drives cause  me issues down the track.
>> >> >
>> >> > Many Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> > Roy Jonas
>> >> >
>> >> >_______________________________________________
>> >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
>> >> > archives,
>> >> > please visit:
>> >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> >> please visit:
>> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> >> please visit:
>> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> >> please visit:
>> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> >> please visit:
>> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> > please visit:
>> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>> >
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to