See we got this~ On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Matthias "InstantMuffin" Kollek < proph...@sticed.org> wrote:
> I second this. > I'd also like to add that the purpose of this group would be more a > reduction of noise than anything. > > Thank you for your statement. > > > On 19.12.2015 01:43, E. Olsen wrote: > > Yeah, I really don't know how a non-server operator would make a strong > advocate for community servers. > > There are perspectives and insight that can only be gained as someone who > operates game servers, plain and simple. That should be plain enough from > the few people who always weigh in on these issues who clearly have no idea > the work and dedication it takes to build a server community around a game, > nor do they understand the impact of Valve directing all traffic away from > community servers by default. > > I also think you're going to run into alot of problems in terms of > "ideology" (for lack of a better word). For example, I know full well by > now on this list who is "pro" MOTD/Pinion ads and who is against it (full > transparency - I think they're a cancer that needed to go a long time ago), > but for you guys that love those things, I doubt you'd find a single "non > server operator" who would ever think plastering your server with ads was a > good idea, since you're basically turning players into ad impressions, and > trying to monetize them before you've provided any actual value. > > At any rate - have at it. I'd probably just be happy if you guys got Valve > to actually say a single thing on the record about the issue, since they've > been in "communication blackout mode" about anything substantive to do with > community servers for over two years now. > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Matthias "InstantMuffin" Kollek < > <proph...@sticed.org>proph...@sticed.org> wrote: > >> A non server op also wouldn't care about servers. Simple as that. Yes, >> you should pick multiple people, and the right ones. But yes, you should at >> least pick someone who represents your party. Not only in terms of having >> an actual representative, but someone who shares the expertise and point of >> view. Come on guys. >> >> On 19.12.2015 01:17, Rowedahelicon wrote: >> >> I think a non serverop would be great. >> >> The personal investments are what drives everyone the way it does I >> imagine, but a non server op wouldn't need to care about a particular >> server, just the game itself. I think finding a candidate though would be >> difficult, unless we put together some input polls and gave it to our >> respective communities? >> >> -- >> *Matthew (Rowedahelicon) Robinson* >> Web Designer / Artist / Writer >> Website - http://www.rowedahelicon.com/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit:https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit:https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > -- *Matthew (Rowedahelicon) Robinson* Web Designer / Artist / Writer Website - http://www.rowedahelicon.com/
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
