2013/5/31 Ondřej Hošek <[email protected]> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Giovanni Harting > <[email protected]> wrote: > > So only because it isn't available directly2you they shouldn't implement > > it? > > Uhh, you completely misunderstood the point (and followed up with a > personal attack, bravo): ISPs are slower than molasses in finally > deploying the overdue update to the Internet Protocol. Hell, I don't > know a single Austrian provider -- apart from universities, but they > are a special case -- who ventured beyond some sort of internal > experimentation. The opinion of the majority here is pretty much "IPv6 > is undoubtedly the future, but many of us are, through no fault of our > own, stuck in the past". >
It wasn't my target to attack anyone, if someone is feeling like that, it wasn't meant to. I know it isn't your fault you not having IPv6 connections, but the important thing is, like mart-jan says, IPv6 will have its boom (fully ack with you in the IPv6 future guessing with you, mart), so it wouldn't be a shame for valve implementing it, even if its not a must have for the next 10 years. > > For what it's worth, if IPv6 is still happily ignored by those who > provide us with Internet, I'm sure there are more pressing issues > Valve will want to tend to first. > > Cheers, > ~~ Ondra > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
