The alternative scenarios and management models for sunsetting do not seem to have been discussed: e.g.

1) allow a customer to run their own home router and control their own broadcast traffic and multicast traffic. With IPv6 there's no reason why stacked routers are harmful, because there's no NAT going on 2) ISP to provide an additional IPv6 only CPE router at the perimeter of the L2 broadcast network, again to limit the broadcast domain
3) to filter using MAC + DHCPv4 black hole addresses
4) to use an out of band management protocol such as active directory to turn off IPv4 in the kernel 5) to request users manual disable IPv4 when contracting the new IPv6 only service
6) tolerate the noise and let IPv4 die a natural death
7) provide separate logical networks for IPv6 only users and legacy IPv4 users
8) allow IPv4 to exist as individual disconnected islands


Michael Richardson wrote:
<snip>

And again: if it's too hard, don't implement it (certainly not in open
source, for free), thousands of devices will never get updated to have it 
anyway.

--
Michael Richardson<[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-




That's rather disingenuous.

The justification for this solution seems to be based on a very myopic view of the Internet.

What may happen is that something like this may be implemented (because it's good for the particular ISPs that heavily rely on large L2 networks) whereas it does not benefit people who route everything (other ISP's and enterprises or home users who manage their own routers and thus broadcast domain.)

Large and small enterprises will then have to scramble to filter rogue IPv6 DHCPv6 servers, even if they aren't running IPv6 yet internally on their networks, and their switches are probably too old to support RA Guard. They'll also want a kill switch on the kill switch in the OS. 'shutdown -h now' as a DHCPv6 option? That's effectively what's being proposed AFAICS.

Why can't I continue to run IPv4 in the privacy of my own home (as an Island)? RFC 6724 will ensure that IPv6 is preferred for all off site traffic.

--
Regards,
RayH

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to