<[email protected]> wrote: >> The order is not to shutdown v4. The suggestion is to stop DHCPv4, if it >> hasn't succeeded, and assume that there isn't any IPv4 for any downstream >> devices. >> >> Ideally the device will not announce an IPv4 default route if it hasn't got >> one itself.
> [Med] This is not a valid generic statement. Consider the DS-Lite model
> (RFC6333): there is no dhcpv4 client in the CPE at all + no assigned
> IPv4 address in the wan side, but still IPv4 connectivity is offered to
> connected hosts. DHCPv4 client is disabled when the CPE detects it is
> attaching the network using DS-Lite. The no-dhcpv4 explicit signal is
> not required for this case for example.
The device still has an default IPv4 route.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
pgpOjJlDD7D9K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
