Bruno Postle wrote: > On Fri 20-Feb-2009 at 12:59 +0000, paul womack wrote: >> The latter would be helpful, but I simply enfuse my induividual >> shots (since they're pre-aligned by the tripod), and then use hugin >> to make a panorama of the already-fused shots. > > This is fine, but beware that such enfused photos are no longer > photometrically related to light in the scene. This means that you > won't be able to use the hugin exposure/vignetting/colour > correction, you would get strange results at least.
Yes - I understand that, but my computer is a too nderpowered to allow an enfuse run with final-panorama-sized frames, in a 5 deep HDR stack. That's a LOT of data. My sequence, whilst having the issues you alude to, is much lighter. Indeed, it is not only lighter, it means that the HDR stacking is only EVER done once, no matter how many times I do a pano-stitch. BugBear --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
