On 26 August 2010 01:24, Yuval Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > On August 23, 2010 01:30:26 pm Bruno Postle wrote: >> When the type of lens is unknown, it would be useful to rerun the >> optimisation using a different lens type and compare the error >> distances.
> I mean: it is so easy to lose the EXIF data along the way that by the time the > images hit Hugin, it can't know what type of lens it is, nor its focal > distance. We can expect a reasonable estimate of the focal length from a modern camera. There is no EXIF standard for indicating a fisheye lens and we now have several input fisheye models to choose from anyway - The optimiser could be used to determine which is the best fit. -- Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
