In a recent note, Paul Gillis said: > Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:40:12 +1000 > > I don't have a problem with multiple CSIs as long as there a a minimum > of Global CSIs. At a previous client, we had only "1" Global CSI, with > one or two CSIs per vendor/product. The Target/DLIB CSI naming > convention made it relatively easy to locate a specific vendors CSIs. > Then it is possible to have your own OPTIONS and UTILITY definitions > without impacting or being impacted by any other product. > Don't OPTIONS and UTILITY entries need to reside in the GLOBAL zone, leaving the possibility of name conflicts. Do you, the customer rename all OPTIONS, UTILITY, and zone names to eliminate such conflicts?
And multiple CSIs under a single global removes the possibility of explicit REQ of IBM service PTFs. -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
