In a recent note, Ed Gould said: > Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:40:27 -0500 > > Agreed. Even take a look an IBM and their completely replacing hole > lmods in their "new" UNIXland modules. I was really discouraged to > see IBM do this. I guess it goes along with the rest of IBM's "OE" > outlook. I complained once to second level about it and got back an > answer that essentially said we know what is best. > I dearly wish that SMP/E were Makefile-savvy so it could play well with others in "UNIXland".
But that's part of a broader issue. The repertoire of utilities available in SMP/E (and associated element types) should be extensible by the customer or ISV (or other IBM product group), not just by IBM Requirement to SMP/E. -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
