On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:39:01 -0500, Kittendorf, Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"IBM suggests that you have an IEASYSxx member that does not specify >CLPA." > >I read this as having an IEASYSxx member without CLPA available if >needed. Not that you shouldn't do CLPA as normal procedure. > Hmmmm... insteresting how things can be interpreted differently. :-) If interpreted the way you do, what would be the reason? To IPL without CLPA after a CLPA IPL failed? Sorry... too late. What other reason? Perhaps you accidently saved a production LPALSTxx member and the system crashed an instant after you saved the member but you really didn't want the change to go in and you can't fix it from another lpar. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - GITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
