Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Phil Smith - who initiated, albeit unwittingly, this fresh eruption - claims >rather oddly for a denizen of IBM-MAIN - that he is not a z/OS person.
One could, if one were so inclined, venture to suggest that anyone who thinks that "IBM Mainframe" implies "z/OS" is himself somewhat deluded. Fortunately, this respondent is not thus inclined. As for the topic itself, I see that it has degenerated well beyond rational discussion, and thus see no further point in continuing it. I wouldn't have bothered to waste the bandwidth to mention this, but the above comment seemed to reflect such a narrow world-view that I was unable to avoid commenting on it. Signing off (from this discussion -- not from IBM-MAIN, IBM-VM, VSE-L, or any of the many other mainframe-related, not-necessarily-z/OS-related lists to which I subscribe) ...phsiii ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
