Shmuel: I work the same way, we have to test, no opinions, being a ISV. We support three security subsystems...RACF,ACF2 and Top-Secret. Even as a Sysprog on VM/VSE and MVS I always tested. To me personally, crazy not to, if I wanted to stay employed. Secondly, I have a responsibility to my employer to do my jo2 to the best of my ability and then some...but thats me
Scott J Ford Software Engineer http://www.identityforge.com/ ________________________________ From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 8:14 AM Subject: Re: 'Inexperienced' RBS tech operative's blunder led to banking meltdown In <CAE1XxDEzxDZ4YJ3iJHU4TqXk34Cvp2J3ysWA0ese=1scde0...@mail.gmail.com>, on 07/02/2012 at 05:33 PM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> said: >John Reid has reminded us all of a generic weakness in the way we TINW. >do things. I don't know about you, but when I install a new system I test it, have an SME test it or both. >Comprehensive IVPs have all but disappeared; That's a problem for a new system, but for an upgrade you should already have a regression test. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
