The command 'T SMF=nn' does not "just start SMF". It tell SMF to change its parameters. My main use in the past has been to add a MAN dataset to the configuration dynamically or to change the SMF options (to change the SMF record types to generate).
I'm not really sure this will fix your problem, because I've never seen CLOSE PENDING before. I was just "free associating" things to try. I don't know if they will work or not. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * [email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of saurabh khandelwal > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:24 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: SMF Dataset CLOSE PENDING ISSUE > > Hello John, > Thanks for reply. This will just start SMF, but > what > about MAN1 dataset, which is in CLOSE pending state. > Rather then creating new SMFPRMnn member, can I create > > 1) MAN3 dataset and attache to the system dynamically to system and > then > use I SMF command to switch MAN2 to MAN3. > > But not sure, IF this is right way to do it.. > > Regards > Saurabh > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
