In
<of44a13ab3.b99bcf59-on85257acb.004bac7f-85257acb.004cf...@us.ibm.com>,
on 12/05/2012
at 09:00 AM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> said:
>All of PLPA is by definition refreshable.
It's certainly refreshable these days, but it wasn't way back in SVS.
OTOH, I always considered it to be bad form to write nonrefreshable
code that was reentrant or LPA resident, even when it was still
supported.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
