But, what does 3215 support have to do with the fact that z/OS requires a special option on the ICC and can not use the 3270 option on the ICC?

Tony Thigpen

Lloyd Fuller wrote on 7/21/20 11:37 AM:
z/VM and z/VSE allow 3215s as their consoles.  z/OS does not.  z/OS requires a 
3270 full screen console.

Regards.

Lloyd

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 11:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Multi-channel OSA-ICC routing and TCP port behavior

I don't have an answer to that. I know what works and what does not. I never 
dug into what was different due to the settings.

Most likely, it was something not in the specifications that z/OS happened to 
use, or had added for some reason, to the 3274 long ago.

Tony Thigpen

Seymour J Metz wrote on 7/21/20 9:32 AM:
Doesn't z/OS work with a real 3270 as a console? If so, then it's the ICC 
that's doing something nonstandard with the 3270 setting.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on
behalf of Tony Thigpen [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 9:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Multi-channel OSA-ICC routing and TCP port behavior

Brian,

In regards to the '3270' or 'console' setting, that is very specific
to z/OS. On z/VSE and z/VM the consoles are set to '3270' in the ICC
configuration. Setting the value to 'console' for them will lead to
problems. Yet, on z/OS, you must set the field to 'console' handle to
some quirk that z/OS has as it relates to consoles.

So, back to your question: "Why?", because z/OS again used something
non-standard in the operating system.

(As someone that works across all three of the operating systems, I
see this often. z/OS plays by it's own house rules, not the rules
printed inside the box top.)

Tony Thigpen

Brian Westerman wrote on 7/21/20 4:44 AM:
I completely disagree.  Why would IBM have two settings in the configuration 
screen for them, one as a 3270 and the other as a console, if they only wanted 
you to be able to use consoles?

Brian

On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:25:54 +0000, Parwez Hamid <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Agreed. The full name is OSA-Express Integrated Console Controller and was 
primarly meant to provide Console Support to IPL OSes. Overtime, its use has 
evolved but the basic concept remains.

Regards

Parwez Hamid​

________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on
behalf of R.S. <[email protected]>
Sent: 20 July 2020 12:17
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Multi-channel OSA-ICC routing and TCP port behavior

Excuse me, but IMHO OSA-ICC is just way to get rid off old equipment
like 3174L. It is NOT replacement, it is only for local (called
non-SNA) terminals, printers and ...CONSOLES. Consoles are the most
important. Of course 3172, 3274, and other controllers were not the goal.

IBM went looong way from 3174s to to ICC. There were 2074 (quite
expensive), VTAM consoles (not very usable for IPL), older SYSCON
(Operating System Messages on HMC) and the latest 3270-like SYSG aka
PCOMM-like icon in HMC. SYSG is AFAIK z/VM nomenclature.


BTW, Note, nomenclaure for "HMC-like" consoles:
1. Operating System Messages
z/VM: SYSC
z/OS: SYSCON

2. HMC Integrated 3270 console (is it proper name?)
z/VM: SYSG
z/OS: HMCS

I don't know about other OSes.

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






W dniu 19.07.2020 o 15:17, Tony Thigpen pisze:
Christian,
I was dismayed too when I first discovered this limitation. The
OSA-C was originally intended to eliminate the local 3174
requirement. It was not really designed to replace the 3172-003,
which is what many are using it for today.

And, you also need to look back at the OSA-C's roots which was the
3274 emulation in the P370, P390 and the MP3000.

Tony Thigpen

Christian Svensson wrote on 7/19/20 8:40 AM:
Thanks for the input folks.

Brian: I have it working just fine, the setup was easy as you said
- the reason I started this thread was because I couldn't
understand why the limitations on the TCP port number and the
philosophy behind the routing.

It seems pretty weird to me that IBM implemented ICC this way, but
hey - I'm just a stranger on the internet :-)


Regards,

On Sun, Jul 19, 2020, 06:52 Brian Westerman
<[email protected]>
wrote:

You can set up some of the ports to be local VTAM terminals, then
you can use VISTA (or any 3270 emulator) to connect into the ICC
port 3270, and use the LUNAME of the 3270 you defined as a local
3270 terminal. Since you can have over 100 terminals per port,
making them all os consoles is a waste, so having a bunch of them
as local 3270's that you can give to your carious LPARs (and use
EE to connect to the LPARs they are not connected to), is a great
way to use them.

I like to make the first 16 to 32 devices OS consoles and the
rest of them local 3270s.

So you are using TCP to get to them inside the ICC, but they are
technically local 3270 terminals.  I think you can make some of
them printers if you want, but that seems like a waste.


====================================================================
==

Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości:

- powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!),
- usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub zapisałeś 
na dysku).
Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może wykorzystać 
tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia (kopiuje, rozprowadza) 
tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania, narusza prawo i może podlegać 
karze.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 
Warszawa,http://secure-web.cisco.com/1MW054EG3HH7zd6_KYgB3xHiByIRUCFrvFJ2qRs4lx6D5q0lhK5v1uSeOBCWS5lSDHI5BmwmkQxhE9yoWBxRFU2AI1ifWz7fzZByptEaMZHD00xwCpmbl6XhDWJZP508IDcMIMukeMGVzZcErMFeuckwFjha9ch7_h8Stc4Ayuwh4RUSAh5THcPOjv3x3_HEnhWAJNKhFRKjK-gsHDBCogtyfdaXWeavEvwEGjKl4j4rfki_1nzjQibqtcP19C3AKMdMKlw1sIhYzDQHZxD3_nW_YnVUVnxS55UmRmfLHcGt58YMRFYKRYL6t5AucuIMOnleJuoYV-lTlnmI7iGviSmqGITb2fuZx5rnu_WEGBmgxqmWBwgPt8ZblcnFGJ6Pcqe6rJlLNkKvVATSW2ZfHm0HpACAjtLwAUsIueqJg2OFGztYmi5ZpBNAyn0G_xPEf/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mBank.pl,
 e-mail: [email protected]. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział 
Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS 0000025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. 
Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości) według stanu na 01.01.2020 r. wynosi 
169.401.468 złotych.

If you are not the addressee of this message:

- let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!),
- delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you have 
printed out or saved).
This message may contain legally protected information, which may be used 
exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who disseminates 
(copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar action, violates the 
law and may be penalised.

mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 
Warszawa,http://secure-web.cisco.com/1MW054EG3HH7zd6_KYgB3xHiByIRUCFrvFJ2qRs4lx6D5q0lhK5v1uSeOBCWS5lSDHI5BmwmkQxhE9yoWBxRFU2AI1ifWz7fzZByptEaMZHD00xwCpmbl6XhDWJZP508IDcMIMukeMGVzZcErMFeuckwFjha9ch7_h8Stc4Ayuwh4RUSAh5THcPOjv3x3_HEnhWAJNKhFRKjK-gsHDBCogtyfdaXWeavEvwEGjKl4j4rfki_1nzjQibqtcP19C3AKMdMKlw1sIhYzDQHZxD3_nW_YnVUVnxS55UmRmfLHcGt58YMRFYKRYL6t5AucuIMOnleJuoYV-lTlnmI7iGviSmqGITb2fuZx5rnu_WEGBmgxqmWBwgPt8ZblcnFGJ6Pcqe6rJlLNkKvVATSW2ZfHm0HpACAjtLwAUsIueqJg2OFGztYmi5ZpBNAyn0G_xPEf/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mBank.pl,
 e-mail: [email protected]. District Court for the Capital City of Warsaw, 12th 
Commercial Division of the National Court Register, KRS 0000025237, NIP: 
526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share capital amounting to PLN 169.401.468 as at 1 
January 2020.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
-- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
IBM-MAIN

--------------------------------------------------------------------
-- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
IBM-MAIN

---------------------------------------------------------------------
- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to