I feel so abused. I actually like vim, especially gvim. Once again, I am totally non-main-stream.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 9:51 AM, David Crayford <dcrayf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/08/2013 10:38 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > >> In >> <1229979691582383.WA.**zatlas1yahoo....@listserv.ua.**edu<1229979691582383.wa.zatlas1yahoo....@listserv.ua.edu>>, >> on >> 08/04/2013 >> at 12:59 AM, "Ze'ev Atlas" <zatl...@yahoo.com> said: >> >> The world of text editor users is divided into three groups, those >>> that believe that vi is God's gift to humanity, those that believe >>> that vi is a bug, not a feature, and those that use ISPF >>> >> While I admit to using an SPF clone[1] on my PC, I believe that emacs >> is more common. As to vi, it may well be The Editor From Hell, but it >> is also the only editor that you can count on finding in an arbitrary >> *ix system. So keep[2] vi. >> >> There are also a number of other editors that some people swear by. >> >> [1] Tritus SPF >> >> [2] Far from me >> >> > You don't mention Eclipse which is free and has C/C++ editors for free. > SMB or NFS mounts make this a piece of cake. I'm a Slickedit user which > supports all mainframe languages, even HLASM. > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
