In <CAAJSdjib6t_m-9iKZOshxHvXBz0=683tfnt-hu4jxfj01wg...@mail.gmail.com>, on 12/05/2014 at 07:22 AM, John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> said:
>Hum, I was thinking more of the UNIX syslog daemon stuff. Which is harder to parse than, e.g., SMF. >Wouldn't including both UTC & local time in ISO8601 be redundant? Only if ISO 8601 requires including the offset. Also, how does ISO 8601 handle fractional time zones? >But perhaps, since you like binary, it would be better to make >this the STCKE value and the CVTLDTO field, and maybe the CVTLSO >field as well. What is important is that the information be recorded and recorded in a consistent fashion. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN