In
<CAAJSdjib6t_m-9iKZOshxHvXBz0=683tfnt-hu4jxfj01wg...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 12/05/2014
at 07:22 AM, John McKown <[email protected]> said:
>Hum, I was thinking more of the UNIX syslog daemon stuff.
Which is harder to parse than, e.g., SMF.
>Wouldn't including both UTC & local time in ISO8601 be redundant?
Only if ISO 8601 requires including the offset. Also, how does ISO
8601 handle fractional time zones?
>But perhaps, since you like binary, it would be better to make
>this the STCKE value and the CVTLDTO field, and maybe the CVTLSO
>field as well.
What is important is that the information be recorded and recorded in
a consistent fashion.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
