On Tue, 30 May 2017 15:08:28 +0000, David L. Craig wrote: >On 17May29:2346-0400, Gabe Goldberg wrote: > >> It's amazing what technology can do: >> http://ericwhitacre.com/the-virtual-choir >> >> https://www.ted.com/talks/eric_whitacre_a_virtual_choir_2_000_voices_strong >> >> ...not symphony, but still remote collaboration. >> >> Timothy Sipples quoted >> >> > A symphony can hardly be performed with everyone working remotely.... > >The collaboration is not in real time. It's like getting >a thousand postcards and taping them together into a collage. >Realtime remote jamming infrastructure is still battling >with the speed of light, but in a few decades modulation of >entangled atoms separated by hundreds of kilometers will >probably trickle down into the high-level musician's home >studio infrastructure. > Interesting pre-pre-pre-Friday topic. I take SR's prohibition of superluminal communication as absolute. But can a choir be synchronized without transmitting information from one member to another? This seems to reflect the assumption for quantum computing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox#Measurements_on_an_entangled_state -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN