On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 16:05, Sharninder wrote: > critical ... yes ... enlightening ... definitely ... > You have in one small (??) mail summed up the state of most of the small > LUGs in India and abroad. If Linux has to grow beyond the level which it has > reached now ... if die hard windows users have to be converted ... then the > social face of Linux ... the LUG meetings ... have to change. <troll> lug meetings are not the social face of linux. they're the exact opposite. linux doesn't have much of a social face yet. when it gets one, lug-s will wither. one doesn't need specialised groups to do things people normally do anyway. case to point: ever seen a "windows users' group"? </troll>
> your statistics are fine but then this is hardly a 'group' ... except for > the three four ppl you have mentioned in the mail ... i don't think anyone > else is actually a member of the group where did you get that idea? shouldn't you verify something before saying it in public? actually, all members of this list are members of ilug-cal. the rule says, in order to be a member, you got to enroll in the list OR attend one lug meeting. so that makes you a member, too. > i'm for this suggestion of fixing up a particular day for the meetings > instead of deciding on the day on the list yes, it seems a fine idea. i think in recent times we have grown large enough for a respectable number to be present at every meet, even if some people have problems with a particular date. - t. -- cogito, ergo es. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3
